Skip to main content

Some musings on Stormrise

Journal Category:




I wanted to give my thoughts on the Aussie developed console RTS Stormrise. Please keep in mind that I’m not a reviewer in any real sense, these are accounts of the game and my views of it as a fellow developer that’s worked on a console game.

So where to begin. Well popping the game in and starting it up I jumped right into the singleplayer campaign. The starting presentation built up an interesting premise and sets the scene, unfortunately the characters then start talking. The writing for these characters is in a word, confusing. The dialogue that hits back and forth between them doesn’t feel genuine and while efforts are made to try and make these central characters have that dysfunctional family vibe it just comes off as a poor performance in both script and voice acting. Coops voice is annoying, it's an opinion I know.

Ok, bad character interactions I can live with. So lets get stuck into the gameplay. What’s the first mission for the new Mech commander? Taking over a stronghold? Leading a group of grunts through a recon line to blow shit up and demonstrate the controls of the game to teach the player. Nope.

Instead you fumble around a shed, a level full of shipping containers and enemies that spawn bluntly in front of you.

We’ve hit a big, big problem right at the start of the game. Not only is the first few levels not setting the grand apocalyptic scene. But more importantly the tutorials required teaching you the controls and tactics for a game this complex is only half way there. Some elements like moving where you point the curser are explained; other elements like how to group troops together are not. The main problem comes from the levels themselves. From level 2 onwards the maps are huge and sparse and have vertical elements with them. This is great if you know how to play the game. But by level 2 I was just getting to grips with moving troops. I wouldn’t have minded some smaller starting levels and digestible mini missions that explain the many intricacies of the whip control system, the camera system and now to effectively micro manage your troops.

So in the second level we hit the heart of the issue behind Stormrise. The triad of conflict between the game camera, the level design and the whip select system.

Now don’t get my wrong for a moment. The Whip select system is a great idea and an interesting way to approach navigation control. If the camera was in a classic RTS top down view and if the level layouts where designed around the camera as primary consideration then controlling and navigating in stormrise would be efficient.

However, The camera is full over the shoulder 3D on your currently selected unit and the level design does not take this fact into consideration. Disorientation due to ‘Whipping’ all over the place, especially in the internal spaces can be a mindfuck and you are continually adjusting your camera in order to get things into view. Internal spaces are usually poorly lit making trying to find out how you get to places an issue. [Gamma and contrast is such an issue that the game has you adjust it before you start. Not a good sign.] The colour palette is also an issue. While the artwork in stormrise is really top self stuff in some regards the bland colour palette makes identifying units and objects difficult. I understand the desire to make the game gritty but is it worth it at the expense of game play? Overall level design isn’t completely broken but the nature of the game camera makes navigating these mammoth levels a chore that never lets up. It’s a nightmare in dark internal spaces.

This is all further compounded by pathfinding issues. Levels are large but have small choke points and gaps. In these gaps it’s far too easy to gridlock units. Units sometimes continue to run past a point you’ve told them to move to only to magically respawn a few seconds later at the allocated point. Units can get stuck easily on geometry; all in all it’s an important feature of this game that needed more time and attention.

It’s hard to judge the power of units in comparison to other units. It’s hard to create a crafty strategy when all that seems to work is building 18 squads of grunts, grouping them and sending them all at once in a tidal wave of tank rush dominance. And it’s annoying that secondary abilities seem to only work when the unit feels like it. My defensive machine gunners only dig down three quarters of the time. The other they just stand there idle, even if the enemy fires at them.

Also, I don’t know if it’s just the PS3 version but it’s got it’s fair share of shipped bugs. Here are a few that I can remember:
· The opening title videos for Sega and Creative Assembly run at a choppy rate.
· Frame rate is inconsistent. Rarely plays smoothly on the PS3. The game also encounters performance hiccups that don’t seem to relate to things on screen.
· In 6 hours of playing the game it has frozen up the PS3 twice. Please keep in mind I own 11 PS3 games and this is the only game to have frozen my PS3.
· When you save the game the process of saving is done is done while the level is running and you have no control over your units.

I understand the PS3 is a bastard to program for, but the excuse of “developed for 360 and ported to PC & PS3” doesn’t cut it anymore. It’s painful to see these bugs in an Australian developed game and to know the level of quality that the guys in CA have brought us in the past. The lack of polish in this game comes off as a surprise. Was there rush from Sega to get this game out quickly? I honestly can't say.

There are some positive things to note. The production of the art is consistent and of a high quality. It’s quite a sight to see 200 of your men traversing the urban terrain at such level of detail and that’s commendable. The soundtrack does its job well and some serious love has gone into the level environments art wise to make them look as impressive as possible. I only wish there was a stronger working union between level design and level art.

Multiplayer I sadly can’t comment on because being a PS3 owner in Australia I’ve yet to find a game probably because the aussie user base is so small. Which is a shame because the game looks like it’s focused some multiplayer love into it.

The verdict:
In my opinion this game needed more time dedicated to polish. Some technical aspects of the game are in need of rationalising like an unruly in game camera and optimising and addressing the pathfinding issues. Level design is hit or miss. I can see that the focus was on trying to create large, capture point-based city scapes. But multilevel indoor areas only help to demonstrate the cameras shortcomings and there’s an inconsistency in level design. It’s never clear where and what your units can and can’t traverse due to your point of view, the lighting and the lack of consistent visual indicators in the levels geometry to poster such things like climbable rubble.

Despite the technical issues the games biggest downfall lays in it’s vague and confusing tutorials [and lack off.] that makes the player have to dip into the instruction manual and controller screens to get their head around how to do half the actions required to play. The learning curve is step and I honestly gave up at level 4 because the AI just continued to throw wave after wave after wave of enemies in an automated fashion. I didn’t feel like I was playing an enemy. I felt like I was playing a basic computer AI.

I think the art team did their job well. Units look detailed and only minor bits and pieces of inconsistency, the Mechs look awesome; the node point shields look horrible.

This game needed more time to bake. Needs a rationalisation in terms of some of its features and a storyline editor to make the confusing conflict and characters of the single player campaign make more sense.

I don't really care much for 'RTS for the home console' thing to be honest. I went out to play stormrise as it's own game. And There is a soul to this game; there is an idea and a premise that can work great. But in it’s current incarnation it’s bogged down in frustration and glitches.

Thank you for reading.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 18/04/09 - 1:02 AM Permalink

this game is getting absolutely hammered in the press. No wonder.. the bad design choices? what were they thinking, it is absolutely unforgivable. The guys should be given the pink slip.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 18/04/09 - 1:29 PM Permalink

That's quite a horrible comment, and it astounding in this climate that you could suggest the mass sacking of so many people. Maybe you should be locked in an attic never to be heard from again. I'm sure most of the real world would not miss you.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 18/04/09 - 2:45 PM Permalink

Some people around here need to accept the fact that the output of the Australian games industry is more often then not sub-standard and dare I say it, crappy.

As a general comment without picking on Creative Assembly, why should further investment be made into a game studio not producing the goods? This is a business, not a charity.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 23/04/09 - 7:15 AM Permalink

Show some fairness? From all accounts, it sounds like these guys actually 'tried'

Berate the developers that are lazy and incompetent - not these guys.

To the Stormrise team: Congrats on delivering an IP on current gen hardware, and trying to do something fresh and new. I'm sure you've taken away lessons from this, and we look forward to Stormrise 2 or whatever is next in the pipeline.

Jesus christ..


Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 23/04/09 - 9:54 AM Permalink

its not horrible , it is a fact that some people shouldn't be making games in this industry. Which results in games like stormrise. Yes it is not a nice thing to say people should be sacked, but it is the reality of this industry. Why keep giving the wrong people chances ,when they keep screwing up? they need to find another profession that they are good at. Sometimes a studio needs to be closed if it cannot be fixed. Lets see what CA produce next, if their next game is good then maybe they were able to sort out their issues and all is good. It is also true that this game looks like it was rushed out the door, and disgarded by sega. fundamentally the game just didn't work and maybe they realised this and thought it was worth releasing the game, getting some profit for what they invested in it.

Submitted by designerwatts on Sat, 18/04/09 - 4:29 PM Permalink

Bad design choices might of played a part in the overall poor execution of this game. But other factors may of also played into it.

The announcement of this game right out of no where, which indicates that it's release date was pushed forward from it's probable outset. Not to also mention that, being a console RTS it was released very close to halo wars, a death sentence for sure.

It does feel like an intentional killing of the game from Sega on some levels. With no build up, marketing or anything else other then shipping the game? Perhaps Sega didn't like the way this game was heading? Maybe due to the recession it needed to lighten it's development costs, Or it could even come down to something as simple as Sega wanting to release 'X' amount of games in that financial quarter.

What I'm getting to is that this game doesn't feel finished, It doesnt even feel like it reached it's original shipping date. And what were now left with a poorly executed game that's struck a blow for Creative Assembly's credibility. And I can only assume that this outcome did mean a company retraction of staff which is always a regrettable shame.

I wish them the best of luck on their future projects.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 18/04/09 - 2:31 PM Permalink

I know you made the comment about X360 ported to other consoles/platforms. I'd be still curious to see if the problems are issues on the 360.

I have a suspicion that the next playstation console will be out sooner rather than later, and that Sony will hopefully learn to make more "rational" hardware. I think its giving them less market share, because you get games that don't play well on it. Its hard to make a game work on PC/Xbox360 and then add it to work on the PS3 as well.

Submitted by designerwatts on Sat, 18/04/09 - 4:19 PM Permalink

Any way you slice development for the PS3 it's a pain to program for. And sony doesn't exactly have much in the way of developer support. Their dev kits are quite expensive [although I think they just recently had a big price drop.] And they do things like charge developers for the cost of game related downloads and upkeep on the PSN network. That's why a few popular mutliplatform games don't support DLC on the playstation 3.

My comment however relates to the fact that the PS3 as a system has been out for 2 years now which means when the project started there would've been no unclear notions on what hardware and software specks you'd be working from. If you have the capacities to program for it, then do so.

Overall if the problems stated above are just exclusive to the PS3 version then it needed to be held back from release for further quality assurance and fixing, or even perhaps scrapped completely so attention could of been focused on creating a more reliable 360/PC build.

Again I don't claim that the bugs I encounter appear in the 360/PC build.